1.
Understand the choices before them, and the implications, pros and cons of each
alternative.
2. Generate
a list of Guiding Principles that will act as a compass for moving forward.
3. Create a
commitment to work together toward one common goal that benefits the entire
community.
What
follows is a summary of the report.
Attendance
at the workshops was low, with less than 25 people attending both workshops.
The first two goals were realized with the participants: people understood the
choices before them and a list of guiding principles was developed. According
to Group 2 there was not a strong “commitment to work together toward one
common goal that benefits the entire community.” As a result, Group 2 goes on
to say, Council and Administration does not have the social license to proceed with
confidence.
The report
discusses two ways negotiations may occur: "interest based or position based.
Interest-based collaboration focuses on meeting the underlying concerns, needs
or interests of all of the citizens. Citizens are encouraged to communicate
what is important about an issue rather than arguing for a specific position or
solution. Position-based thinking is a traditional, power based negotiation
tactic and does not look for common solutions. A stance or ‘position’ is taken
early in the process and people focus on their own wants and needs. It is often
adversarial with little focus on future relationships.”
The report
goes on to say: “One group has consistently taken a ‘position based’
approach--the performing arts group. They are the only group to adopt this tactic
and refuse to consider approaches other than their own. There were several
declarations made; most notably these included:
·
Stating
they ‘will walk away from the table’ and not participate if a phased approach
is chosen.
·
Stating
they will withhold funds and begin a parallel process wherein they would build their
own theatre.
·
Repeatedly
discrediting the capital cost projections and the operational cost projections,
despite the rigourous approach and applicability of the referenced facilities.
·
Disregarding
the results of the public input questionnaire that indicated 70% of the
respondents supported an approach with aquatics as the first phase.
·
Believing
that programming and booking challenges that have burdened similar theatre facilities
will not happen to them and declining to submit data to support this belief.
This
‘position-based’ approach has the potential to divide the project and the
community. Despite the performing arts group deep belief in their position, they
represent a very small percentage of population. The views of the ‘silent
majority’ whose presence was seen in the surveys must be weighed against this
position.”
The good
news is that a list of guiding principles was developed by the interest based
participants and includes:
·
Goal
clarity
·
Commitment
to a common goal
·
Clear
direction
·
Strong
leadership
·
Socially
and fiscally vibrant
·
Trust:
do not look back on past hurts
·
Future
based—always think about the future
·
Sustainable
·
Change
silos to collaborative effort
·
Pride
in ourselves and community
·
Strategic
fundraising efforts
·
Engage
with the younger generation
·
Identify
and celebrate benchmarks
·
Smart
human resources
·
Socially
and fiscally vibrant
The report
also highlights that we are taking an integrated or unified approach to
planning; these should be public documents before the end of March. We are
assessing or pursuing these projects:
·
Regional
Landfill
·
Reducing
the infrastructure deficit
·
Conducting
an infrastructure assessment to ensure our water treatment plant and the waste
water lagoon has the capacity to cope with our commercial, industrial, and
residential growth.
·
Our
storm water system,
·
Water
mains and more.
·
Town
Square.
·
Implementing
the traffic study,
·
New
Fire Hall and a new ladder truck
The report
says that “Administration and Group2 painted a very clear picture of the
realities in which Kindersley was operating within. The participants spoke on
the need for clear decisions, strong goals, and a strategic approach to achieving
those goals.”
As a result
of what was heard at the workshops Group 2 has revised their recommendation
from Option B to Option C: “Based on our analysis, removing or reducing the
barriers is more probable under Option C: A Phased Approach. Option A would
dramatically increase all restrainers other than ‘Position based thinking’
which would be reduced.”
Here are
the recommendations from the report:
1. Council formally approve the phased approach
(Option C) should the Town feel that this project merits further investment in
relation to other capital projects currently being considered.
2. Obtain a formal decision from the performing
arts group whether they wish to participate further or not.
3. Formally bring to conclusion the MUBC
committee and celebrate the success of this group.
4. Appoint a new strategic facility development
committee.
5. Complete a strategic plan and detailed
work plan for the committee that clearly outlines goals, initiatives and
performance measures.
6. Complete a communication plan for the
initial stages of the project (that can be bridged into the fundraising plan).
7. Hire a firm that specializes in
capital project fundraising to develop a comprehensive fundraising plan with a goal
to raise the necessary funds for the project.
8. Begin implementation of first steps of
the fundraising plan.
Further, I think
two more things need to be done to start the project on the right foot:
1. Form an arm’s length Fundraising
Group with their own charitable number and trust account that is responsible
for fundraising.
2. Form a Building Committee.
This has
been a long process for us and I appreciate your patience. We are being
intentional to ensure that Phase 2 the West Central Community Centre is a
success both as a facility and as a project that binds Kindersley together.
No comments:
Post a Comment