Friday, 15 November 2013

Planned Infrastructure Growth: Some Highlights

What follows are some miscellaneous notes about infrastructure growth.
  • the key to good solutions is simplicity (KISS).
  • here is some interesting stats regarding the Return on Investment (ROI) of infrastructure spending aside from quality of life
    • under-investment can result in a loss of 1.1% in real GDP,
    • a 20% cut to net profit of Canadian business,
    • loss of wages/salaries of workers,
    • after investing in infrastructure the taxpayer is better off by $1.48 on average after tax
      • stats from RiskAnalytica for the Rsidential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario.
  • many growing communities infrastructure systems are stressed;
    • we are trying to be ahead of the curve.
  • Kindersley is doing things the right way.
  • demands for potable water are not the same as waste water;
    • fracking is a concern
    • when looking at the expansion of waste water system we should look at the end product first;
      • we will look at reusing the waste water for industrial use such as fracking thus being both environmental and fiscally prudent.
  • Kindersley has a unique situation:
    • pump raw water 55kms to be treated,
    • pump waste water ~11 kms to final location.
    • our water system will be reviewed from the river (55 kms) all the way to Teo Lake (11 kms)
  • the treatment plant capacity should be based on consumption not population.
  • regarding lagoons compared with waste water plant:
    • 20% of waste water systems need replacing in Canada at an estimated cost of $20 billion
    • we are at a tipping point to move from lagoon to mechanical processing such as a waste water plant.
    • the aeration at the lagoon costs $3,100 per month in power;
    • a mechanical waste water plant would use a little more power.
    • our current lagoon does not meet current regulations regarding location to residential areas
      • we could use the lagoon for storage in conjunction with a waste water plant in the same location;
      • Teo Lake is not an engineered location to meet regulations;
      • the pipeline to Teo Lake is near capacity.
I hope this helps you understand some of the things we are considering. If you have any questions please email me and I will try to answer.

No comments:

Post a Comment